Bury St. Edmunds and Forest District Councils are seeking a joint executive at a price range between £105,000 and £115,000. The advertisement in the MJ (formerly the Municipal Journal) concludes with “We need someone whose time has come to help create a shared vision for West Suffolk – and then deliver it”. The bells started ringing and then suddenly the penny dropped. It sounds like an up to date version of: “Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer” — “One People, One Nation, One Leader”. With attributes like these at such a low cost you can see why Woolworth’s went bust. Meanwhile with two district councils and one Chief executive I see at least three contenders for the post of Generalissimo or Duce.
Fuller details are available on http://www.stedmundsbury.gov.uk/sebc/live/ChiefExecutive.cfm
Year: 2012
The Anchor, Woodbridge
We were in Woodbridge today and found ourselves in the ridiculous position of being surrounded by restaurants and not fancying anything on the various showcased menus. So we strolled down Quay Street but the Moorish Lounge was closed and at the back of my mind I recalled seeing a recent advert for the Anchor. (http://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/ShowUserReviews-g186387-d1888346-r80287310-The_Anchor-Woodbridge_Ipswich_Suffolk_East_Anglia_England.html) Madam had the root vegetable soup (very thick and definitely not for sharing) and I had the Cajun Seared Salmon. They cheerfully accepted our requirements of no bread, potatoes or rice and acknowledged that side salads would be acceptable. The food was good and the service was cheerful and efficient. The atmosphere and the log fire were just what we needed on a coolish day with the wind off the water. Definitely on the list for revisiting. Photo courtesy of http://www.suffolkcamra.co.uk/pubs/images/thumbnails/pub/1025.jpeg
Tesco still wants a new store in town
The EADT reported on the 7th: A Supermarket giant will not challenge a decision to refuse it permission to build a new store in Hadleigh, the EADT can reveal. Tesco had been widely expected to appeal after Babergh councillors expressed concern over whether their grounds for refusal were strong enough. But with the deadline looming for challenging the July decision, Tesco said it would instead return to the drawing board to come up with a better design. It means the long-running saga will rumble on for some time yet despite the supermarket chain expressing hope it will have new designs ready by the end of the year. A spokeswoman for Tesco said: “We’d like to build a supermarket that is acceptable to the council and local people and therefore we will not be lodging an appeal. “We are now working on a different design and look forward to consulting the council and the local community in due course, on how we can improve this. “We have appointed some expert designers – a range of them – to come up with some ideas and we have started putting together some draft plans. “These independent experts will tell us whether they think it is compatible with the heritage and feel of Hadleigh. “We don’t want it to stall any longer, it’s been a long process already. But we don’t want to rush things and make another mistake.” Tesco’s plans for a 2,500 sq metre store on the former Brett Works site were narrowly rejected in July, despite Babergh District Council planning officers recommending approval. Planning members refused the proposals because of the store’s design after being told concerns over its impact on traffic and independent stores were not valid reasons for rejection. Brian Haylock, owner of independent bookshop The Idler, said: “If they put in a design like the Taj Mahal we could say we don’t like it. But I don’t suppose we’ll do that, I fear Tesco will get their way. “I think it would change the whole nature of the town, which at the moment is a typical thriving British town. “We shall go on fighting it, we’re not going to give in. “But it does look disheartening sometimes especially when our objections are dismissed, such as those about the effects a Tesco will have on trade. “I still feel the same about Tesco – I can’t accept them coming into the town. There are very persistent and I suppose we should be on our guard against them.” http://www.eadt.co.uk/news/hadleigh_tesco_still_wants_a_new_store_in_town_1_1171186
So we continue to live and fight another day.
Who wears the dog collar?
Today’s column by Damien Thompson in the Telegraph (http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100128028/opus-dei-and-the-patron-saint-of-electronic-eavesdroppers/) reports as follows:
More trouble i
n the Anglican Communion, I’m sorry to relate. Traditionalists in Canada have taken offence because a woman priest, the Rev Marguerite Rea of St Peter’s, Toronto, gave communion to a dog – specifically, a German Shepherd cross called Trapper. Ms Rea explained that this was “a simple act of reaching out” to a new congregation member and his pet. Alas, the Synod has yet to approve extending the sacrament to dogs – and I predict a fuss when the proposal does come up, not least from cat owners who will feel excluded. Also, as my Catholic priest friend Fr Tim Finigan points out on his blog, (http://the-hermeneutic-of-continuity.blogspot.com/ ) “an incidental problem for trendies wanting to give the wafer to dogs is that they are not likely to follow the more modern practice of receiving in the hand”.
It makes the Paris Bourse look like a parish council
An open
letter to German Chancellor Angela Merkel (Published in the Express – see below for a link to the original and the comments).
Tuesday December 13,2011
By Frederick Forsyth Dear Madame Chancellor,
Permit me to begin this letter with a brief description of my knowledge of, and affection for, your country.
I first came to Germany as a boy student aged 13 in 1952, two years before you were born. After three extended vacations with German families who spoke no English. I found at the age of 16, and to my pleasure, that I could pass for German among Germans.In my 20s I was posted as a foreign correspondent to East Germany. in 1963, when you would have been a schoolgirl, just north of East Berlin where I lived.
I know Germany, Frau Merkel, from the alleys of Hamburg to the spires of Dresden, from the Rhine to the Oder, from the bleak Baltic coast to the snows of the Bavarian Alps I say this only to show you that I am neither ignoramus nor enemy.
I also had occasion in those years to visit the many thousands of my countrymen who held the line of the Elbe against 50,000 Soviet main battle tanks and thus kept Germany free to recover, modernise and prosper at no defence cost to herself. And from inside the Cold War I saw our decades of effort to defeat the Soviet empire and set your East Germany free.
I was therefore disappointed last Friday to see you take the part of a small and vindictive Frenchman in what can only be seen as a targeted attack on the land of my fathers.
We both know that every country has at least one aspect of its society or economy that is so crucial, so vital that it simply cannot be conceded. For Germany it is surely your automotive sector, your car industry. Any foreign-sourced measure to target German cars and render them unsaleable would have to be opposed to veto point by a German chancellor.
For France it is the agricultural sector. For more than 50 years members of the EU have been taxed under the terms of the Common Agricultural Policy in order to subsidise France ‘s agriculture. Indeed, the CAP has been the cornerstone of every EU budget since the first day. Attack it and France fights back.
For us the crucial corner of our economy is the financial services industry. Although parts of it exist all over the country it is concentrated in that part of London known, even internationally, as “The City”.It is not just a few greedy bankers; we both have those, but the City is far more. It is indeed a vast banking agglomeration of more banks than anywhere else in the world.
But that is the tip of the iceberg. Also in the City is the world’s greatest concentration of insurance companies. Add to that the brokers, traders in stocks and shares worldwide, second only, and then maybe not, to Wall Street. But it is not just stocks. The City is also home to the exchanges of gold and precious metals, diamonds, base metals, commodities, futures, derivatives, coffee, cocoa… the list goes on and on. And it does not yet touch upon shipping, aviation, fuels, energy, textiles… enough.
Suffice to say the City is the biggest and busiest marketplace in the world. It makes the Paris Bourse look like a parish council set against the United Nations and even dwarfs your Frankfurt many times.
That, surely, is the point of what happened in Brussels. The French wish to wreck it and you seem to have agreed. Its contribution to the British economy is not simply useful nor even merely valuable. It is absolutely crucial. The financial services industry contributes 10 per cent of our Gross Domestic Product and 17.5 per cent of our taxation revenue. A direct and targeted attack on the City is an attack on my country. But that, although devised in Paris, is what you have chosen to support. You seem to have decided that Britain is once again Germany’s enemy, a situation that has not existed since 1945. I deeply regret this but the choice was yours and entirely yours. The Transaction Tax or Tobin Tax, you reserve the right to impose, would not even generate money for Brussels. It would simply lead to massive emigration from London to other havens. Long ago it was necessary to live in a city to trade in it. In the days when deals can flash across the world in a nano-second all a major brokerage needs is a suite of rooms, computers, telephones and the talent of the young people barking offers and agreements down the phone. Such a suite of rooms could be in Berne, Thun, Zurich or even Singapore. Under your Tobin Tax tens of thousands would leave London. This would not help Brussels, it would simply help destroy the British economy. Your conference did not even save the Euro. Permit me a few home truths about it.
The euro is a Franco-German construct. It was a German chancellor (Kohl) who ordered a German banker (Karl Otto Pohl) to get together with a French civil servant (Delors) on the orders of a French president (Mitterrand) and create a common currency. Which they did. It was a flawed construct. Like a ship with a twisted hull it might float in calm water but if it ever hit a force eight it would probably founder. Even then it might have worked for it was launched with a manual of rules, the Growth And Stability Pact. If the terms of that book of rules had been complied with the Good Ship Euro might have survived. But compliance was entrusted to the European Central Bank which catastrophically failed to insist on that compliance. Rules governing the growing of cucumbers are more zealously enforced. This was an European Bank in a German city under a French president and it failed in its primary, even its sole, duty. This had everything to do with France and Germany and nothing whatever to do with Britain. Yet in Brussels last week the EU pack seemed intent only on venting its spleen on the country that wisely refused to abolish its pound. You did not even address yourselves to saving the Euro but only to seeking a way to ensure it might work in some future time. But the Euro will not be saved. It is crumbling now. And since you have now turned against my country, from this side of the Channel, Madame Chancellor, one can only say of the euro: YOU MADE IT, YOU MEND IT.
The full article (and the comments) may be found on http://www.express.co.uk/ourcomments/view/289553/Frederick-ForsythAn-open-letter-to-German-Chancellor-Angela-MerkelAn-open-letter-to-German-Chancellor-Angela-MerkelAn-open-letter-to-German-Chancellor-Angela-Merkel